Target intelligence
Question → dossier → evidence gaps → review
PERSLIS SCIENCE / HOW IT WORKS
From a real question
to a defensible next move.
See the complete path and the work it enables in one place. Lois operates the tools, the source contract pins each result, and Perslis retains the record across target research, hypothesis testing, experiments and team handoffs.
◈ Evidence connected⌁ Unknowns stay visible
THE WHOLE PATH
The answer is only the visible end.
Follow the same inspectable path from a real question to the decision it changes.
01ASK
02RETRIEVE
03PIN
04VERIFY
05RETAIN
HOW THE PATH GETS USED
Move the decision, not just the cursor.
Trace the evidence path, then use it to advance scientific work without losing the record behind the decision.
Hypothesis triage
Candidate path → exact records → experiment
Research operations
Objective → durable run → review gate → report
Team handoff
Sources + notes + failures + next questions
EXPLORE THE DETAILS
Every part of the work, connected.
01
Our weightless system
Research with a system that keeps evidence close and uncertainty visible. Ask questions, review the supporting sources and carry useful work into your next session.
Explore Our weightless system02
Evidence graph
Explore connections in your research and open the supporting sources. See where evidence is available and where a promising idea still needs a test.
Explore Evidence graph03
Provenance
Return to the scientific sources behind an answer. Review the basis of a claim and share those references with another researcher.
Explore Provenance04
Abstain logic
Lois can return unknown when the recorded evidence does not support an answer. Missing evidence remains visible instead of being completed with a plausible guess.
Explore Abstain logic05
Background runs
Longer work can retain its questions, intermediate results and failures across a session. Review what ran and what remains unresolved before promoting a result into retained knowledge.
Explore Background runs06
Literature research
Collect papers around a question, follow their identifiers and compare the claims they support. Keep contradictory findings and missing evidence visible in an evidence map.
Explore Literature research07
Drug / protein research
Build a target dossier from sequence, structure, pathway and literature records. Compare molecular evidence without treating a database association as proof of therapeutic effect.
Explore Drug / protein research08
Experiment tracking
Keep a run’s question, inputs, conditions and results together. Retain negative outcomes and failed attempts so the next experiment starts with the full record.
Explore Experiment tracking09
Discovery
Follow connections across sources, compare hypotheses and find the gaps that deserve a test. A proposed explanation remains a hypothesis until evidence supports it.
Explore Discovery10
Lab automation
Explore WetHands for experiments that involve software, instruments and physical actions. Begin with a scoped pilot and review execution evidence before expanding the workflow.
Explore Lab automationSEE IT IN ACTION
See our weightless system in action.
An existing public demonstration of the weightless research experience.
Recorded on a research prototype. The recording shows the scope demonstrated at that time.
Explore the research floor yourself →PERSLIS / SCIENCERECORDED DEMO
ONE CONTINUOUS THREAD
From a question to a record you can inspect.
01Ask
02Retrieve
03Pin
04Verify
05Retain
BRING LOIS A REAL QUESTION
Start a research pilot →Let your next discovery start here.
Start with a target, a dataset or a research question. Inspect what the evidence supports, what it rejects and what remains unknown.